市场情绪
多伦多看跌 58%
温哥华观望 52%
卡尔加里看涨 61%
蒙特利尔观望 55%
埃德蒙顿看涨 54%
萨斯卡通看涨 66%
全国综合观望 50%
全国 多伦多 GTA 温哥华 蒙特利尔 卡尔加里 渥太华 万锦 列治文山 本拿比 奥克维尔 密西沙加 素里
Market Snapshot·2026-09-12

Rents Down 3.6%, CMHC Wants 417K Starts: Canada’s Housing Puzzle

David Chen | Author

Canada’s Rents Fell 3.6% While CMHC Asked for 417,000 Starts a Year

Two pieces of official data landed in the same week, and at first glance they describe two different countries.

On September 9, Statistics Canada reported that the average asking rent for a two-bedroom apartment across all census metropolitan areas fell to $2,130 a month in the second quarter of 2026, down 3.6% year over year. Vancouver was down 4.1%, Montreal 5.2%, Calgary 6.4%.

Days earlier, CMHC’s Fall Housing Supply Report concluded that Canada needs between 417,000 and 469,000 new housing units a year to restore the relationship between prices, rents and household incomes to 2019 levels by 2036. Under current trends, the country is on pace for roughly 231,000 starts a year.

Rents are falling, resale sales are soft, and the official target still calls for nearly double the current pace of construction.

The contradiction is not in the numbers. It is in the way Canada describes the problem. The phrase “housing shortage” has been carrying two very different issues at once: whether the market has enough units, and whether ordinary households can actually afford the units that exist.

The Rent Data: $2,130 for a Two-Bedroom, Down 3.6%

The Quarterly Rent Statistics program, run by Statistics Canada with CMHC, measures asking rents posted on major rental platforms. It covers purpose-built rental units and the secondary rental market, and excludes collective dwellings, vacation homes, mobile homes and subsidized housing.

In the second quarter of 2026, the national average asking rent for a two-bedroom apartment was $2,130 a month, down 3.6% from a year earlier. The city-level spread is far more informative than the national number.

CMA Average asking rent, 2-bedroom Year-over-year
Vancouver $3,030 -4.1%
Toronto $2,650 lower
Victoria $2,640 lower
Halifax $2,400 +5.3%
Calgary $1,890 -6.4%
Montreal about $1,900 -5.2%
Abbotsford-Mission lower -6.4%
Thunder Bay lower +6.5%
Sherbrooke lower +5.7%
Saskatoon lower +5.2%

Source: Statistics Canada, Quarterly rent statistics, second quarter 2026, released September 9, 2026.

The key takeaway is not the 3.6% national decline. It is that Canada does not have one rental market. Vancouver’s asking rent for the same unit type is roughly 60% higher than Calgary’s. In the same quarter, some cities were falling while others were still rising.

Asking Rent and Paid Rent Are Not the Same Number

This is where most commentary goes wrong. Every figure above is an asking rent: the price posted for a newly listed unit, not what existing tenants actually pay.

Statistics Canada published paid rent alongside it, meaning the amount current tenants pay under existing leases. In most CMAs, asking rent is higher than paid rent, because older leases were signed years ago and are subject to provincial rent increase rules.

Three cities buck that pattern. In Calgary, asking rent was $1,890 while paid rent was $1,930. In Regina, asking rent was $1,480 against paid rent of $1,580. In Edmonton, both were $1,570. The highest paid rents were Vancouver at $2,470 and Toronto at $2,160.

For anyone currently searching for a unit, the market is genuinely softer than it was two years ago. New rental completions, slower population growth and tenants who have hit their affordability ceiling have forced landlords to compete. For a tenant who signed a lease five years ago, none of that shows up in the monthly bill, which still moves according to the rent increase guideline.

Vancouver: 26.2% More Listings, 20.7% Fewer Sales

The resale market mirrors the rental side.

Greater Vancouver Realtors reports that residential sales in the region totalled 1,869 in August 2026, down 4.6% from the 1,959 sales recorded in August 2025, and 20.7% below the 10-year seasonal average of 2,356. Active listings reached 15,798, which is 26.2% above the 10-year average. New listings came in at 4,100. The composite benchmark price was $1,081,900.

Toronto shows a similar pattern. TRREB’s August data put the MLS Home Price Index Composite benchmark down 4.5% year over year, with the average selling price at $993,410, down 2.7% from $1,021,300 a year earlier. New listings dropped 14%.

Market August 2026 indicator Change
Greater Vancouver 1,869 sales -4.6%, 20.7% below 10-year average
Greater Vancouver 15,798 active listings 26.2% above 10-year average
Greater Toronto Area MLS HPI Composite -4.5% year over year
Greater Toronto Area Average selling price $993,410 -2.7% year over year
Calgary 1,660 sales -16% year over year

Sources: Greater Vancouver Realtors, August 2026; TRREB Market Watch, August 2026; CREB, August 2026.

Inventory is more than a fifth above the long-run average while sales sit more than a fifth below it. This is not a market without housing. It is a market where transactions stopped happening.

Calgary’s Condos Are Repricing 13% Below Their 2024 Peak

Calgary’s split is the clearest example in the country: the overall market is holding, but apartment condominiums are being repriced on their own.

CREB’s August 2026 data shows 1,660 sales across the city, down 16% year over year, and 3,141 new listings, down nearly 10%. Inventory slipped 2.3% to 6,509 units, and months of supply rose nearly 17% to just under four months citywide. The total residential benchmark price was $569,000, down 1% year over year.

Apartment condominiums bore the heaviest decline. The August benchmark price was $295,400, roughly 8% lower than a year earlier and about 13% below the peak levels recorded in 2024. Months of supply for the apartment segment stood at about 4.9 months in July, well above the lower end of balanced territory. Detached home prices, by contrast, were essentially flat.

That divergence has been building since 2025. It was already visible in the Calgary market split earlier this year, and August simply pushed it further.

Why Falling Prices Are Not Bringing Buyers Back

Falling prices do not automatically produce affordability. That is the mechanism most commentary skips.

A condominium falling from $700,000 to $650,000 is still out of reach for a household that can carry $500,000. A rent falling from $3,200 to $3,000 is still a stretch for a household with $5,000 in after-tax monthly income.

What matters is the gap between income, prices, and financing costs. When one of the three moves and the other two do not, affordability barely changes. The full cost-of-living comparison between Canada’s two largest cities shows how differently that gap plays out depending on where a household lives.

The 5-Year Bond Yield Rose 23 Basis Points in a Week

Financing costs moved again this week, and in the wrong direction for anyone waiting for cheaper money.

Bank of Canada data shows the 5-year Government of Canada bond yield climbing from 3.40% on September 4 to 3.63% on September 10, a rise of 23 basis points in a week. On August 25, the same yield was 3.22%.

Date (2026) 5-year Government of Canada yield
August 25 3.22%
September 1 3.35%
September 4 3.40%
September 8 3.44%
September 10 3.63%

Source: Bank of Canada benchmark bond yields.

Three clarifications matter here. The 5-year bond yield is not the fixed mortgage rate a borrower ultimately receives, though it is a key input into how lenders price fixed terms. A 23 basis point move in the bond market does not mean every fixed mortgage rate rose by the same amount. And it certainly does not mean the Bank of Canada has raised its policy rate.

What it does mean is that the room for further declines in fixed mortgage rates has suddenly narrowed.

That creates an awkward arithmetic for households: the purchase price may have dropped by tens of thousands of dollars, while the cost of borrowing it may be turning back up. If mortgage rates rise while property taxes and condo fees keep climbing, a buyer’s monthly housing bill does not necessarily fall along with the transaction price.

The practical conclusion is that affordability should be measured after the down payment: what does this household pay every month, and what share of after-tax income is that? The relationship between fixed mortgage pricing and central bank policy was covered in detail in the analysis of why rate cuts do not automatically lower home prices.

What CMHC’s 417,000 to 469,000 Actually Measures

Now to the biggest number in this story.

CMHC’s estimate of 417,000 to 469,000 units a year is not a claim that millions of Canadian households are currently homeless, and it is not a count of units missing from the resale market tomorrow.

It is a model output. It estimates how many units would need to be built each year for the relationship between prices, rents and household incomes to return to 2019 levels by 2036. Against current trends of roughly 231,000 starts a year, the model implies the pace would need to nearly double.

That calculation says a great deal about Canada’s construction capacity. It does not prove that hitting the number would make housing affordable, because whether a unit solves a housing problem depends on where it is built, how large it is, what it sells for, and whether local household incomes can carry it.

A Completed Unit Is Not an Affordable Unit

Two examples show how the total and the household bill come apart.

On the ownership side, consider a household that can carry $500,000. If local new condominium projects need to sell at $750,000 for the developer to cover land, labour, materials, financing and government charges, that project adds a unit to the national count while adding zero purchaseable supply for this household.

On the rental side, a city adding 10,000 new units at rents above $3,000 a month increases the measured stock. For a household that can carry $1,500, the housing problem is unchanged.

This is why rising starts, rising inventory and falling asking rents can all coexist with an unchanged affordability crisis. Those indicators measure the market. The crisis lives in household budgets.

156 Condo Units Started in Toronto in Six Months

Construction composition tells the same story from the supply side.

CMHC reports that only 156 condominium units were started in the City of Toronto in the first half of 2026, against an average of about 7,000 units a year over the previous decade. Not 1,560 units. 156.

In Metro Vancouver, condominium apartment starts fell 40% in the first half of 2026, the weakest first half for new condominium construction since 2011. Montreal’s condominium and other ownership starts remained near multi-year lows.

These are extreme numbers, but they do not automatically mean prices will surge in a few years. The more useful question is why developers are not building.

The answer is arithmetic. At current land, construction, financing and government charge levels, many new condominium projects only work at very high price points, and buyers will not pay them. New condominiums in parts of Montreal are priced 20% to 40% above comparable resale units. If the resale unit next door sells for $600,000 and the new project needs $750,000 to $800,000, a buyer has to accept years of delay risk, appraisal risk and completion risk for a worse deal.

Weak presales mean no construction financing. No financing means no start. The decline in condominium starts is therefore not primarily evidence that Canada is about to run out of homes. It is evidence that the current production model cannot deliver ownership housing that buyers can carry and builders can profitably construct.

Developers Switched Product: Rentals Now Dominate Starts

Developers have not stopped building. They have changed what they build.

According to CMHC, purpose-built rental apartment starts in Toronto increased 82% in the first half of 2026, the only housing category that grew, supported by government financing programs, municipal incentives and condominium-to-rental conversions. In Vancouver, rental apartments accounted for about 60% of housing starts in 2026, compared with less than 20% in 2016. Montreal went furthest: rental units made up a record 86% of all housing starts in the first half of 2026.

City Rental share of starts Context
Montreal 86% in H1 2026 Record share
Vancouver about 60% in 2026 Under 20% in 2016
Toronto purpose-built rental starts +82% in H1 2026 Only category that grew

Source: CMHC Fall 2026 Housing Supply Report.

This shift is producing real results. It is adding tenant choice and pushing asking rents down in several cities, including the 3.6% national decline documented above, after 22 straight months of falling asking rents.

The problem is that rental construction cannot fully substitute for ownership housing. If new rentals cluster at high rent levels, lower-income households are still excluded. If condominium construction keeps shrinking, the path from tenant to owner narrows for middle-income families.

What to Watch: Five Household-Level Numbers

The number worth remembering from this week is not 417,000. It is the set of questions a household can answer about its own market.

  1. Is active inventory in your city above or below its 10-year average, and are sales recovering or still sliding?
  1. Of the units being added, how many are two- and three-bedroom homes that families actually need, rather than small investor-oriented units?
  1. When prices fall, do your monthly mortgage payment, property taxes and condo fees fall too? Subtract the increase in carrying costs from the price decline to get the real improvement.
  1. How far apart are asking rent and paid rent in your city, and what is the guideline for rent increases on existing leases?
  1. What is the split between rental and ownership starts locally? That determines whether renting households will have a path to ownership in three to five years.

Canada has cities with genuine unit shortages, cities with plenty of listings that ordinary households cannot afford, and cities adding rentals while losing purchaseable supply. Those are different problems, and one national construction target cannot address all three.

High inventory today and fewer completions in three years can both be true. Whether prices rise from here depends on population, employment, incomes and interest rates. If demand stays weak, falling construction does not guarantee a rebound.

Watch the household numbers instead: how many listings exist locally, how many of them are two- and three-bedroom homes families need, what share of after-tax income the monthly payment consumes, and whether the new units are homes a household can buy or apartments it can only rent at a premium.

Without answers to those questions, chasing a national construction target risks becoming another numbers game: projects started, subsidies delivered, statistics looking strong, while a household walks into a sales office that is still out of reach and a rental office that still asks too much.

Housing is a household bill before it is a national total. If the units exist but households cannot afford them, if construction continues while more families can only rent, and if prices fall while monthly payments stay far above income, then what Canada is short of is not housing of any kind. It is housing that an ordinary-income household can afford to stay in for the long term.